Stables-REVISED. Really Bad Protection of the ADC

What's different about this deck?
It has more stall than previous versions.
I removed the excess stable cards that weren't necessarily top-tier.
It's less reliable on stables being actually on the board.
What was I going for with this deck?
With a wall of tanky defenses, I can ramp up untargetable "units" so that they may 1-shot an enemy with high defenses in order to take less counter-damage. I've amped up most of the stall so that i may do that. This is essentially a mash-up of my Protect the ADC(stall with humans) deck and my original Really Bad Rotations(stables) deck. It would most likely work well on decks who rely on stall and high-defense monsters(humans, feyfolk). Any suggestions you might like to add, please do so!
2x Stables 2
Shandain 3
Fjor 4
Leif 5
3x Standard Bearer 8
3x Cavalier 11
2x Imperial Sniper 13
2x Architect 15
3x Beast Master 18
3x Dire Hawk 21
2x Fallen Angel 23
3x Charger 26
3x Hulking Gorilla 29
2x Savannah Huntress 31
3x Imperial Shieldmaster 34
3x Vigilant Watchman 37
3x Enchanted Armor 40
2x Tjin Lo Sturdy 42
1x Tjin Lo Samurai 43
2x jai Mau monk 45

this deck looks to be a very solid deck, the only suggestions i would have is to take out dire hawk, its honestly not good, also take out architect, because as you said, your deck doesnt rely on stables at all really, also put in the last imperial sniper, good card is good

Dire Hawk is incredibly strong due to the fact that it can stack up Attack incredibly fast and is essentially an incoming one shot. Dire Hawk's main weakness is counter, but with this deck, you will be countered only once. You keep a Dire Hawk around with constantly increasing Attack and anything they place will be 1 shot. Same with Savannah Huntress, but Savannah Huntress can only do it once.